Showing posts with label TELCO. Show all posts
Showing posts with label TELCO. Show all posts

Thursday, September 11, 2014

How to do surveys - always in your favour :)

Today I got an invite/pop-up from a local TELCO. As I am always keen to provide feedback to improve the situation, I tried to spend couple of min to give my honest feedback.

But when I saw this page (screen shot below) I end up leaving the page. They knew that the "survey organizer" which in this case the website admin or outsourced company (i guess) need to get good marks.

Good & may be Hard way - listen to the customers, users and update.
Easy & simple way - Skew the survey results in their favour and claim that they are doing a great job.

So the survey asks questions but gives options to choose -
Poor - Average - Above Average - Good - Excellent
(-1)        (0)                    (+1)              (+2)       (+3)

We normally see,
Poor - Below Average-Average-Above Average - Excellent/Good
(-2)        (1-)                    (0)              (+1)       (+2)


So you see how it end up.. They remove the far negative and the end score would be way better than the reality. No wonder these days social scientists, data scientist jobs are in demand. :)


Sunday, May 25, 2014

SDN - A myth or reality

In my industry, we see some hype about some cutting edge technology every 3-5 years. I recall from the recent past IMS (IP-Multimedia System) as one of the most hyped item which fell apart. Now a days the most hyped (or abused) word is SDN.

SDN stands for Software Defined Network and it's been positioned by many vendors as the next big thing in Telecom/networking industry.

After listening to the same 'promises' for over an year and after speaking to many Tier-1 Telco CTO's/Architects, I deduce that SDN is not going to change any of the market dynamics(atleast in Asia) in next decade. Now, the problem is the attitude and the business models in APAC. Almost all the operators (expect some in Korea, Japan and now China) are modelled after a business entity which need to look in to cashflow in the short term. There are many, led by accountants, or finance folks but not by engineers. I don't see any great engineers in these firms but more of administrators 'managing' the networks with 90% help from the vendors. Also they are looking for 'cost efficiencies' but not some sort of innovation. Also another key issue is the 'risk avoidance/transfer' at all costs. i.e. it shouldnt go down, if it does then there has to be someone responsible.

Also the size of the networks (unlike USA/Australia our geography, and demands are diff) makes a big deal. If it's in the pure data centre model, then some operators may take a chance but how many of these operators going to implement a 'OEM' switch to carry mission critical applications? IMHO, almost none.

So here you go. SDN. Not so soon for us.




Tuesday, April 2, 2013

SingTel Store & Share - Another me toooo service or any differentiator ?

Just got a message from SingTel that there is a free upgrade from Store & Share as I am their premium subscriber (?).
http://info.singtel.com/personal/internet/addons/store-share/detail

So I was curious on what made SingTel to believe they can go head-on with OTT players like Google Drive, SkyDrive, SugarSync & the ubiquitous Dropbox.

As expected it's NONE. There is nothing SingTel can do better compared to dropbox or for that matter sugarsync. Why should I even bother to upload my documents to SingTel even if it's free to me.

This is the biggest issue I've found with many of the TELCO firms. Especially in Asia where end subscribers are tech savvy, no point going with "me too" approach. If SingTel is thinking "consumers" trust a local telco compared to OTT player then sorry guys, I've to disappoint you. You are the same bandwagon (if not worse) and by the way I can't see your privacy policy details. I see FAQ but no privacy policy..

So is it the "SPEED" which SingTel is selling? If that's the case, may be there is a logic if the volume is high. For example 10's of GB. But if I've such a big data or huge data, I'd invest in a decent NAS and a backup disk. Also, the huge data may not be suitable to be stored as per T&C. And if you look in to the details, the terms of service, liability & Privacy is as good as a third party BV registered company.

So what is the VALUE SingTel offering and what am I missing here ? 



5.6 SingNet and SingTel Mobile reserve the right in its absolute discretion to suspend, discontinue and/or terminate (in whole or in part) the Service without any liability whatsoever to the Customer.

5.7 Upon any termination, suspension or discontinuation of the Service, all data stored by the Customer will be deleted and the Customer's account for the Service shall be removed and the Customer shall in no event hold SingNet nor SingTel Mobile liable for any such deletion or removal of data.


5.9 Neither SingNet nor SingTel Mobile shall be responsible for any loss of data or information pursuant to the use of the Service by the Customer.


8.1 SingNet and SingTel Mobile reserve the right to manage and control access to any computer or any SingTel system or any computer linked to any SingTel system and any data stored therein, in a manner deemed appropriate by SingTel, and to delete any data (whether belonging to, provided or stored by the Customer or otherwise), notwithstanding that such access and the storage of such data is a requirement or constitutes a part of the Service.


Wednesday, March 21, 2012

SingTel Optus to cut hundreds of jobs

Source: Skynews

Though this is no surprise I pity Optus. Its a double whammy for Optus, given the current business situation &on top of it the regulatory situation in Australia is not good either. But the timing of this may send a wrong message to general public. i.e. Major re-organization to merge Consumer businesses in Singapore + Optus, then sack hundreds of Optus staff. Is it the jobs're taken our from Australia and moved to Singapore?

Well, that's not the case atleast for the time being. It may happen in the future which is uncertain right now. But one day SingTel or for that matter majority of telco's in Asia will go towards managed services path. With such a heavy reliance on $ &C & limited focus on innovation, we are not going to see an Engineering led TELCO. This will simply result in 'less costs' & 'more profits' culture which MS promises on the paper.

Update:


Too fast to post my entry. Saw the news on SingTel 'outsourcing' their network to Huawei in ChannelNewsAsia

Too bad to hear that SingTel outsourcing to Huawei. I believe its a tough decision for SingTel given their legacy/culture.


Sunday, January 8, 2012

SMRT Circle line signalling problem (3rd time in quarter), Qantas A380 problem, SingTel network problem..

What exactly is going on? Are we totally lost our focus on the quality in pursuit of higher profits? Or is it just a matter of coincidence?. I prefer to settle with the latter option but something in my mind tells me very strongly that it can't be a mere coincidence.

Atleast from Singapore context I can tell confidently this is due to the 'skill-set' issue at top management. There're days when technology companies are led by Engineers but now a days these are run by Accountants. In my 8 years experience at a local telco, I saw how the attention changed from quality to profitability or business case. Engineers were no longer considered as an 'asset' and replaced by 'scholars'. While I respect these scholars I strongly oppose the idea of they running the network. These scholars are not techies but fresh graduates and 'book' smart. They rely completely on vendors and make decisions based on 'vendor' criteria.

I'd experienced few challenges working with them and it was kinda 'dilbert show' to me. The classic one was during the 3G launch. One of the 'planner aka planning manager' who is a fresh grad (ASIAN scholar) supposed to 

Tuesday, March 22, 2011

NTP 11 - New Telecom Policy of India

Source: Hindu

The early indications show, that the government is moving in the right direction. They are recommending, Preferential status to "Made In India" goods. Noting that we are increasing depending on services sector its a good move to improve the manufacturing sector. I wish to have an equivalent of Huawei/ZTE or Samsung/LG in India. We are spending billions of dollars every year on telecom equipment but failed to develop a complete eco system. Given the scale of market it puzzles me and wish to get some info on it.


Monday, March 21, 2011

AT&T to buy T-Mobile. Signs of consolidation in the telco markets??

Source: LA Times

If approved by regulators, this would create the largest telco in US with 130 million subscribers (Verizon - ~94 mil subscribers) and the market will see more such attempts.

IMO, if there is any country with real requirement (from $ & c perspective) that would be India. Right now there are more than 15 operators with licenses and at least 4 to 5 major players in any of the region. Bharti, Reliance, Vodafone, Idea, Aircel & BSNL controls majority share. Regional players like Spice, MTNL, BPL gained respectable share and continue to create competition in their respective markets. New entrants like Etisalat, Videocon, Unitech, S Tel have not started their operations but showed great ambitions. Also TRAI didn't rule out the possibility of opening up for more MVNO's.

I don't think any other country has such a huge number of players in the market and there is a great need of consolidation. Big guys like Bharti, Voda, Rcom may target regional players and small players. But a perfect surprise would be if they manage to merge. They can streamline their operations, reduce their capital expenditure and improve profitability which is good for them as well as the overall market.

Singapore, I don't see any such possibility with the three players in a perfect Oligopoly market. I remember IDA tried to introduce a fourth player but finally distributed the spectrum to the three players.

Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, & Philippines markets are similar in nature with high barriers and lots of uncertainties.

So overall in the ASEAN region I don't hope for M&A but in the South Asia I do hope that M&A activities rise and create a balanced market.





Thursday, March 10, 2011

Singapore Mobile users are more data hungry..

Source: Fiercebroadbandwireless


FierceWireless: Are you looking at tiered pricing or application-based charging?
Montefiore: The CEO of France Telecom was speaking at the GSMA Leadership Forum and he said that 60 percent of the data traffic is generated by 10 percent of the base. In Singapore 90 percent of the data traffic is generated by 3 percent of the base. Some are paying too much and some are paying too little. We really have to rebalance this. And it's up to the operators within the GSMA to get together and figure this out.

Above lines are directly copied from Fiercewireless website. For more interesting comments please check the direct link above.

If I've to comment, I'd say this is mainly due to the market positioning. In Singapore all three TELCO's positioned Mobile data as a replacement rather than complimentary to Fixed broadband. Just like how Mobile phones became personal and replaced the home fixed phones, the mobile internet positioned to replace the fixed internet at homes. We've young couples who didn't subscribed to DSL or Cable internet at homes and just relying on iPhones or Samsungs for their internet connectivity. With the wonderful coverage we've in Singapore this further spurs the replacement.

Also the cost (~SGD 10-15 for unlimited monthly) which is perhaps the lowest in the region further accelerated the adoption. So we've people who subscribed to mobile internet and using bittorrent or file downloads or P2P streaming almost continuously.

Now, I am sure the three telco's engineers and managers are looking to reduce their costs & how to normalize the behavior. All of them are doing Traffic Shaping via Fair Usage Policies (FUP) and trying to offload traffic to Wi-Fi or fixed internet. I'll continue with another post on the offloading, policy options & challenges.

Monday, January 24, 2011

Prank on Mobistar, Belgium - Revenge on the TELCO

This is really hilarious.. I just wish the TELCO's (or for that matter any service provider) learns how frustrating their service is...

Kudo's to the team who performed this and hope next time they target the management team of Mobistar rather than the poor mobistar..


Thursday, January 6, 2011

A tech company should be run by Engineers

Source: Business Insider

Have a look at the businessinsider slides. These are from an Engineer who worked at perhaps the greatest technical company of current time Apple.

I tend to agree with the point no.1, which is a technical company should be run by engineers rather than managers. I've experienced this many times and we even have a complete archive of Dilbert to find some solace. I used to see Engineers as CEO's & Mgmt folks in Singapore previously but recently the trend seems it's the Finance guys running the show. Sadly our three TELCO's are headed by finance folks :|

BCG Publishes Top performers from Technology, Media & Telecom

Source: BCG

Boston Consulting Group (BCG) published a white paper "Swimming Against the Tide" which summarizes how well companies performed in the past few years and how organizations can proposer in the new economic environment. They focussed on Technology, media & Telecom sector.

Good to find,

* Infosys(3), TCS(6) & Wipro(10) are the three Indian companies out of top ten Technology organizations. Apple is the no.1 followed by mediatek.

* No Indian company in Media business. Tencent is the no.1 and Google ranked as no.4

* Bharti (3) is the only Telecom company. American Movil and China Mobile are the no 1 & 2.

They've shared the five strategic options for TELCO players in the report too. Personally I didn't liked the summary as it's in the same league of 'dumb networks' kind of stuff. What I believe is Telecom Networks or ISP's are just like logistic providers in the e-world. They need to ensure proper delivery and they may try to add some value added services but not like trying to open the parcel and meddle with the content or generate income by meddling with the B-party.
Anyway it's a good read for strategy students & industry folks.

Thursday, December 30, 2010

Skype launches video calls on iPhone

It's just three days back I've mentioned about Skype Video calls on Phones. Now they've announced on iPhone. Great job guys and eagerly waiting for Android.

Now this is not going to be a good news for Mobile Operators. In Singapore I don't think the impact would be great but in Europe and developing countries this is going to affect a lot of operators. Given the small size of Singapore the main user group of Skype would be expats/foreigners. So I'd expect most of the calls happening from home/residential rather than over mobile phone. So the primary device still a notebook/pc while mobile can be used as an emergency device or backup device.

Source: Skype

Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Skype credit voucher received

We all know Skype was down recently for more than 24 hours. I am quite sure it'd caused inconvenience to lot of users.

When I saw the update where Mr. Tony Bates mentioned that they will offer free credit voucher, I thought just another marketing talk and in reality this not going to be practical. (I was thinking along the lines, first you need to find how many people affected etc..see this is the problem with telco world, we always think we know a lot and doesnt accept that what we know is very little)

I didn't expect that Skype wouldn't bothered to go along the lines and simply offers the credit to all it's customers. This morning it's a sweet surprise to me. They had offered me $1 credit voucher. While I certainly agree that this is not a huge amount, can any of we guys remember that any of our TELCO's or ISP's offering rebates or discounts voluntarily? 


A big thanks to Skype for hearing your Customers.... Keep it up..

Thursday, December 23, 2010

Telco's EBITDA comparison

I was reading a wonderful article at fellow blogger (I learned few points from his blog on investments) on Telefonica and then it made me curious to see what is the EBITDA for the TELCO's around the world. Ok, let me confess I have not spend a lot of time finding the data but basically I checked the annual reports of major Telco's I know from emerging markets as well as developed world (with the exception of US). You'd be surprised to see the margins.

Below is the graph showing the margins. The top 3 from emerging markets are,

* Telkomsel - Indonedia (66%)
* Djezzy - Algeria (57.1%)
* Globe - Philippines (54%)

In the above markets one common item is relatively high revenue from "voice" & "sms" or basic services. Moving forward it'll be interesting to see whether these operations can maintain their high ebitda when they move to data business or the data revenue % increases. My belief is the margins will erode when the % of data revenue increases. Which means indirectly smart phones coupled with dongles affecting telco margins.


The table showing the details is given as well. I excluded US and south america completely as I am not very familiar with the region. 


However in the emerging markets, the cost of operations and annual capital expenditure will be relatively high as the focus is on growth. In the developed/matured markets the costs will be relatively low.

Wednesday, December 22, 2010

TELCO's asking Content providers (Google, Apple, Facebook) to pay for network investments

There is an article in Business week, where by the Operators are asking big players like Google, Apple, facebook to pay for the network investments. The rationale given by Operators is, service providers are flooding networks with no incentive to cut costs'. Also there is another comment 'Companies such as Google and Yahoo use operator networks for free, which is good news for them and a tragedy for us'.

Though I am with operators most of my career I would never agree with this rationale. The way I see TELCO's are just like a transport company like SingPost and the job SingPost does is to carry the items from "point-A" to "point-B" and they charge "sender-A" to provide this service. Yes, SingPost can charge basic charges for basic services and premium charge for registered or faster delivery. There is no way I'd agree if SingPost wants to charge twice because the content inside my parcel can make my parcel recipient rich

TELCO's are quite similar in my opinion as they charge "subscriber" and deliver the content from Point-A to Point-B. The entire frustration, negative impression of TELCO's is mainly due to the fact that TELCO's wants to meddle with the flow.

Monday, December 20, 2010

Singapore telecoms - challenges/priorities for the CEO's

This morning I saw the article in Today's news paper "Calling loyal customers - telco's biggest challenge". In summary the strategic options of the three local telco's are,

* SingTel - be a multimedia player (betting on content, apps and local/customized services)
* StarHub - betting on NG-NBN. Not given much info but I guess the focus right now is still in bundling (Hubbing) strategy which is one of the best success stories in the market.
* M1 - Going to be a triple play player. In essence follow bundling option.

In my humble opinion, the options are not very strategic but more tactical. When all players in the market opt for similar plans and without a tangible or intangible differentiation among themselves the outcome would be more likely on the 'cost differentiation'. I am sure none of the stakeholders would like to see eroding margins and a 'price war' in the small local market.

I believe there is no silver bullet for the challenges, but if I've a place in the board ;), I'd love to hear what are the strategies/priorities for next few years. While there is substantial difference between the three operators, the commonality is mobile (which is contributing the most to the bottom line), and I'd say below are the top 8 challenges/priorities for the CEO's,

1. Google, Apple, Facebook bypassing Ops from value chain
2. Consistent Strategy/goals with organization values
3. Excellence in Execution
4. Customer Loyalty/Retention
5. Stimulating Innovation/Creativity/Enabling Entrepreneurship
6. Maintain Profit
7. Evaluate and prepare funding for Future technologies (LTE, 4G etc)
8. Recruit/retain skilled workforce/management

1. Google, Apple, Facebook bypassing Ops from value chain.

With more and more innovative services coming from these giants, I started to believe that one day the business model as we know today will shift radically. We've seen how Apple changed the game with their iPhone and I strongly believe this is only the beginning.

* Apple has facetime which is developed based on existing open standards but the key is execution and packaging. Apple managed to succeed where TELCO's failed with "Video Call". I don't remember I ever used 3G video call before though it's more closely integrated with my hand phone. Apple can enable the 'voice' addition to the Facetime and they have plans to release it to the public. That's when things will be more interesting as we can expect third party app's integrating with Windows Laptops & Potentially android :). Result will be less voice minutes in mobile networks (assuming people will use VoIP with SIP be it video or without video)

* E-sim, softsim coming in the next few releases of iPhone (More details in my previous post here)

* Android launching with NFC & trying to get a pie from Payment market. This will seriously impact the hopes of operators "m-commerce" services. If I've a choice to buy using Google checkout & credit card I'd definitely go for it rather than asking my mobile operator to charge as part of my monthly bill. As of now I've problems understanding the operator bill with unnecessary details and missing necessary details.

2. Consistent Strategy/goals with organization values

3. Excellence in Execution

No need to explain but we've seen with MIO TV, Starhub new billing system & M1 fiber plans. All our telco's seems to improve a lot on the execution. I am sure they've wonderful management, skilled engineers & great marketing folks but somehow all these different parties couldn't do what Apple, Facebook or Google did.

4. Customer Loyalty/Retention

Honestly this is one area where our operators are doing a good job in 'numbers' perspective but failed to meet the expectations due to various reasons. The first touch point which is the shops itself needs lots of improvement. Today's Customer is technically savvy and they knows the technologies very well. However our service departments are relatively under developed and still consists of mostly entry level service staff. Thanks to outsourcing(if it's done proper ways I don't see an issue but most of the times service providers outsource because it's CHEAP), sometimes the officer doesn't even understand what we are talking about. Need lot of improvement overall in this aspect

5. Stimulating Innovation/Creativity/Enabling Entrepreneurship
Some how we end up became the followers. We've Telephone just after four years of it's invention and our incumbent boasts over 125 years of history and one of the largest telco in the world. However when we look in to the contribution portion there is hardly anything to be proud of. Is it because organizations tend to focus on $ or other reasons. I don't know but I wish our telco's too cultivate an environment where we can show to the world that we've got talent. Singapore being one of the most advanced nation in terms of infra, coupled with savvy customers can be an unique nation which can be used as a technology hub. We can quickly introduce something with relatively low investment or do advanced technology trials. This can be bring lot of 'value add' to the nation as well as company. IP plays a critical role in knowledge society.

6. Maintain Profit

Nil. I've nothing much to say here as the leaders knows very much about this.

7. Evaluate and prepare funding for Future technologies (LTE, 4G etc)

Same as in item no.5, but this poses a different challenge to the CEO's. They need to invest lots of money to buy 'spectrum', invest in networks and people. But the bottom line of LTE or 4G is it offers higher speed to end customers with a relatively cheap prices (i.e. the cost to serve 10Mbps is cheaper with the LTE

8. Recruit/retain skilled workforce/management

I remember sometime back SIA used to be preferred employer and even people like to join technology firms. but today the focus seems to be going to Financial sector which means the best of breed is no longer going to be in technology sector anymore. Only Philips is in the top 10 and SingTel managed to get 85th position and the only telco in top 100(Link Here). If Operator need to head on or be in a respectable position at negotiation table they need to have best brains working with them.

In conclusion, the road ahead going to be very bumpy and only the toughest and smartest will reap the benefits while the rest will remain as the 'dumb pipes' providers. http://singapores100.com/2010-rankings/

Friday, December 17, 2010

Challenges to Mobile Operators

I was reading an article on Apple e-sim concept and I realized the big change happened. It was really dramatic and once it's highly skewed towards Mobile Operators where as now they are taken for granted. Ofcourse I won't blame the otp's (Like apple, google) or industry bodies (3gpp, gsma) but the blame goes to Operators themselves. Moving forward there are many challenges for an operator and below is a small summary from my point of view.

1. Innovation
Traditionally TELCO's are not good in innovating. They've been working within the stipulated standards set by ETSI or IEEE and the same thing continues in Mobile space. Some operators may be an exclusion but most of them look at 3GPP for 'guiding them to do a task'. In my interaction with the operators many a times I faced this question. "Is it endorsed by 3gpp?". Though I can understand the dependency on standard's compliance, I've to mention that innovation often started when the organization or person defy the existing rules/situation.

Today we see the innovation driven by OTP's &  App developer. If the Mobile operator continues the same way sooner or later they are going to at the mercy of them. We've seen how Apple draw the terms when iPhone was launched and it continues even now.

In a survey done by Total Telecom, 39% mobile operator answered "App developers" for the question "What sources of innovation do you think mobile operators should rely upon most over the next three years". Sadly it's not going to help operators.


2. Financials

2.1. Margins
Gone are the days when telco's enjoy >50% EBIDTA margins. Even when we look at the  operators in US or in Singapore the trend is clear. The margins are dropping and you can see from the graph here for Singapore largest telco.

2.2. High CAPEX

Most of the Operators are spending money right now or need to spend hefty amounts. The advanced network owners in developed nations need to spend money on LTE or expanding the 3G networks, and the developing nations on 3G or HSDPA networks. By any means this is not going to be a small amount. Added to that the big chunk kept aside for "Spectrum" it's going to be a lot of money out of operator pockets.


2.3. Increasing OPEX

Just look at the SingTel financials for last 3 years and you'd see a clear trend of increasing operating expenditure.
Here is the graph showing the increasing acquisition cost (Money spend to get a new subscriber on board)


One may say that with the revenue increase the costs tend to be higher. I agree but the ratio seems dropping. Below is the graph for revenue for the same period. As we can see,

* Revenue is growing but at much slower pace than expenditure
* Selling & Admin costs almost doubled
* Cost of sales almost doubled

3. Technology


Today's mobile operators combat zone is no longer restricted heavily by regulation and many disruptive technologies can hit them hard.


3.1. Disruptive Technologies


Technologies like VoIP, callback, Alternate roaming, Wi-Fi hitting them hard right now. In future expected technologies like soft-sim, e-sim & advertising can potentially hit the bottom lines. I'd focus on the softsim concept as I found it very interesting and the impact to operators can be quite hard.

Here is a presentation on this done by me.




3.1. Failure to capitalize on new technologies

We all talk about how Apple changed the game play with Apple. But I still remember their first foray which is with Motorola (Here). But Apple quickly learned the lesson and optimized the experience to masses. Apple became such a game changed because

* They are innovate and quick to conceptualize the ideas
* Excellent product packaging (if something doesnt work on Apple they would say it's a feature)
* Excellent distribution together with great support.

Sadly, our TELCO's fail in each and every aspect. I've seen in the past many TELCO's showing interest in VoIP. But they are too late in to the market. Even when the entered (StarHub did a great job with pFingo) the product packaging is bad and virtually zero support (try opening pFingo website or query on mediaring. you'd know what i am talking). In my observation, a typical life cycle of idea in TELCO's goes like this


So by that time the product is launched in the market either someone else took the lead or the idea is no longer fresh/disruptive.

Anohter dangerous sign I've seen is the "reducing importance on technology". With the exception of few respected operators (like NTT, Verizone, Voda etc) most of the operators are not investing in technology development. For any question the simple solution is "give a call to vendor". While I was talking at sidelines during a conference (Frost & Sullivan) in Singapore recently I realized none of the Mobile operators in this region invested in IPv6. They seems to be looking at the 3GPP & Vendors (e.g. Ericsson, Nokia, Huawei) to tell them what to do. Once operator loose the strong technical skills the next thing is to loose on the ability to offer innovative products leveraged on the technology.

IPv6 is one of the big thing going to happen.

M2M is another interesting concept but at this point of time it seems to be a big game changer.

4. Customers

Did we ever see a Gen Y chap wearing a SingTel or StarHub t-shirt? If there is what would be the expected comments from his/her friends? Well, excuse me for being so pessimistic but if we're to ask a question why people are perceived "Cool" when they are associated with Apple, Google but not with TELCO's?

Today's customer is no longer the customer from old days who is happy when a call is connected and sms is delivered within 2 minutes time. They are getting smarter and thanks to internet they even know how mobile networks work, and the technologies behind most of the service. Unfortunately the Operator call centers failed to evolve. They are still bound by the decades old SOP (Standard Operating Procedure) and most of the times the first suggested solution to many of the problems is "please restart the phone".

Major issues in this category would be

* Loyalty
* Customer touch points/Call Center revamp
* Customer Experience
* SLA's

5. Others

There are plenty of other issues. But here I outline some of the issues which would have considerable impact in my opinion

5.1. Falling smartphone prices

Today people still sign contracts and Operators subsidize some of the cost of the expensive handphones. When the handphone prices drop to the threshold point it will be an interesting game play. Customer may choose to buy directly from the handphone manufacturer thus bypassing the operator from the value chain. It can be positive to the operator in terms of cash flow but can be very negative as the control goes to the handset manufacturer. For example Google can sell the handset and "offer" services from "network operator" which is quite opposed to today's dynamics.

5.2. Regulatory & Compliance risks

So far the regulatory aspects on Mobile operators are not as hard as on the traditional players. When things like Net Neutrality, Compliance requirements enforced strongly by regulators this would increase their costs/hurt their bottom lines.

6. Conclusion

In summary, the future is not going to be an easy ride for most of the operators. The time is now and the top management need to act now to ensure if they want to be an effective player in the next decade. They need to start invest in technology, adapt best practices, develop in-house expertise and accept the fact that there will be some impact to the bottom lines and find alternate ways to address the revenue drop. I'll be writing another article soon. Till then happy holidays.

Tuesday, December 14, 2010

How to select core router - Cisco, Juniper, Huawei, ZTE, ALU, Ericsson ??

Ok. Let me confess. The entry is written after my boss asked me to develop an evaluation criteria for a new tender. It's kind of putting the tacit knowledge in to black & white terms/spec which I've not done for quite some time. After talking to some of my ex colleagues (within the company of course) and going through the product spec I drafted the spec.


I went through various phases before coming up with the final spec.


1Current utilization
Input: CACTI, NMS etc
Output: Find where to start and input to Item 2

2.Traffic Projections
Input: Item1, projections, trending and some scenario planning
Output: Define the required packet forwarding rates, Port matrix, scalability requirements

3.Service offerings
Input: Product Strategy plan, Industry predictions
Output: Define required services, features

4. Integration/Interoperability
Input: Network strategy, existing network features, node features
Output: Interoperability requirements

5. Standard HA features
Input: Industry best practices, Lessons learned
Output: HA requirements

6. Standard security features
Input: Industry best practices, Lessons learned
Output: Security requirements

7. Standard green features
Input: Industry best practices, Lessons learned
Output: Power, Footprint etc spec

In the end it looks like


* A router that can start at 20 Gbps and able to handle up to 100 Gbps packet forwarding;
* Supports cascading chassis
* Mixture of 1GE, 10GE and road map to 40GE/100GE
* MPLS, VPLS requirements
* Shall work with existing Cisco, Juniper boxes and features
* NSF, BFD, VRRP,  etc
* L2, L3 Access lists etc
* 6000watts limit, chassis size


It'd be great to hear from the rest and to know how do you guys come up with the specs?